Mined Opinions For API: sjsxp

This tab contains all the opinions collected from Stack Overflow about the API. The other tabs present summaries of the opinions using different algorithms.
  • Correct, I should have mentioned that one too.. details
  • For sake of completeness, I will also mention that Woodstox ( URL_http://woodstox.codehaus.org ) is another Stax impl that does work well -- alas, JDK-bundled SJSXP has some issues that XML module can not work around with (esp.. details
Summaries the opinions about sjsxp using topic modeling.
  • 0. mention: 1
    • Correct, I should have mentioned that one too.. details
  • 0. completeness jdk sake stax ala mention module woodstox bundled impl: 1
    • For sake of completeness, I will also mention that Woodstox ( ) is another Stax impl that does work well -- alas, JDK-bundled SJSXP has some issues that XML module can not work around with (esp.. details
Summaries of the opinions about sjsxp using three algorithms (Textrank, Lexrank and Luhn) adopted from extractive summarization. Each algorithm was used once for the positive opinions and once for the negative opinions.
  • Correct, I should have mentioned that one too .
  • Correct, I should have mentioned that one too .
  • Correct, I should have mentioned that one too .
  • For sake of completeness, I will also mention that Woodstox ( ) is another Stax impl that does work well alas, JDK bundled SJSXP has some issues that XML module can not work around with (esp .
  • For sake of completeness, I will also mention that Woodstox ( ) is another Stax impl that does work well alas, JDK bundled SJSXP has some issues that XML module can not work around with (esp .
  • For sake of completeness, I will also mention that Woodstox ( ) is another Stax impl that does work well alas, JDK bundled SJSXP has some issues that XML module can not work around with (esp .
Summaries of the opinions about sjsxp using Opinosis, an abstractive summarizer of opinions..
Summaries of the opinions about sjsxp using contrastive viewpoints. Each entry contains a pair of positive and negative sentences that are most likely discussing about similar API features.
Summaries of opinions about based on specific API aspects, such as, performance, usability, etc. The 'Overview' page provides an overview of the aspects detected in the opinions. The 'Trend' page shows the distribution of polarity over time for each aspect. The 'Positive Opinions' page groups positive opinions by the detected aspects. The 'Contrastive By Aspect' page shows paris of contrastive opinions under each aspect (where found).
Features:
  • Correct, I should have mentioned that one too.
  • N/A
Usability:
  • N/A
  • For sake of completeness, I will also mention that Woodstox ( URL_http://woodstox.codehaus.org ) is another Stax impl that does work well -- alas, JDK-bundled SJSXP has some issues that XML module can not work around with (esp.
  • Features: 1
    1. general: 1
      • Correct, I should have mentioned that one too.. details
  • Usability: 1
    1. general: 1
      • For sake of completeness, I will also mention that Woodstox ( URL_http://woodstox.codehaus.org ) is another Stax impl that does work well -- alas, JDK-bundled SJSXP has some issues that XML module can not work around with (esp.. details