Mined Opinions For API: resteasy

This tab contains all the opinions collected from Stack Overflow about the API. The other tabs present summaries of the opinions using different algorithms.
  • I have used both Jackson and Gson for the JSON support with RESTEasy and it is quite simple.. details
  • I have used both Jackson and Gson for the JSON support with RESTEasy and it is quite simple.. details
  • Another really great part of RESTEasy is the good support for multipart form data.. details
  • I highly recommend URL_http://www.jboss.org/resteasy [JBoss-RESTEasy] for the REST API.. details
  • Using a JAX-RS compliant interface gives you a little bit better portability if you decide to switch to a different implementation down the road.. details
  • Using a JAX-RS compliant interface gives you a little bit better portability if you decide to switch to a different implementation down the road.. details
Summaries the opinions about resteasy using topic modeling.
  • 0. jboss rest highly simple jackson gson multipart form: 3
    • I highly recommend JBoss-RESTEasy for the REST API.. details
    • I have used both Jackson and Gson for the JSON support with RESTEasy and it is quite simple.. details
    • Another really great part of RESTEasy is the good support for multipart form data.. details
  • 0. jax portability implementation switch decide bit road: 1
    • Using a JAX-RS compliant interface gives you a little bit better portability if you decide to switch to a different implementation down the road.. details
Summaries of the opinions about resteasy using three algorithms (Textrank, Lexrank and Luhn) adopted from extractive summarization. Each algorithm was used once for the positive opinions and once for the negative opinions.
  • I highly recommend JBoss RESTEasy for the REST API .
  • I have used both Jackson and Gson for the JSON support with RESTEasy and it is quite simple .
  • Another really great part of RESTEasy is the good support for multipart form data .
  • I highly recommend JBoss RESTEasy for the REST API .
  • I have used both Jackson and Gson for the JSON support with RESTEasy and it is quite simple .
  • Another really great part of RESTEasy is the good support for multipart form data .
  • I highly recommend JBoss RESTEasy for the REST API .
  • I have used both Jackson and Gson for the JSON support with RESTEasy and it is quite simple .
  • Another really great part of RESTEasy is the good support for multipart form data .
  • Using a JAX RS compliant interface gives you a little bit better portability if you decide to switch to a different implementation down the road .
  • Using a JAX RS compliant interface gives you a little bit better portability if you decide to switch to a different implementation down the road .
  • Using a JAX RS compliant interface gives you a little bit better portability if you decide to switch to a different implementation down the road .
Summaries of the opinions about resteasy using Opinosis, an abstractive summarizer of opinions..
Summaries of the opinions about resteasy using contrastive viewpoints. Each entry contains a pair of positive and negative sentences that are most likely discussing about similar API features.
Summaries of opinions about based on specific API aspects, such as, performance, usability, etc. The 'Overview' page provides an overview of the aspects detected in the opinions. The 'Trend' page shows the distribution of polarity over time for each aspect. The 'Positive Opinions' page groups positive opinions by the detected aspects. The 'Contrastive By Aspect' page shows paris of contrastive opinions under each aspect (where found).
Portability:
  • N/A
  • Using a JAX-RS compliant interface gives you a little bit better portability if you decide to switch to a different implementation down the road.
Onlysentiment:
  • I highly recommend URL_http://www.jboss.org/resteasy [JBoss-RESTEasy] for the REST API.
  • N/A
Performance:
  • I have used both Jackson and Gson for the JSON support with RESTEasy and it is quite simple.
  • N/A
Compatibility:
  • N/A
  • Using a JAX-RS compliant interface gives you a little bit better portability if you decide to switch to a different implementation down the road.
Usability:
  • I have used both Jackson and Gson for the JSON support with RESTEasy and it is quite simple.
  • N/A
  • Onlysentiment: 1
    1. general: 1
      • I highly recommend URL_http://www.jboss.org/resteasy [JBoss-RESTEasy] for the REST API.. details
  • Performance: 1
    1. general: 1
      • I have used both Jackson and Gson for the JSON support with RESTEasy and it is quite simple.. details
  • Usability: 2
    1. general: 2
      • I have used both Jackson and Gson for the JSON support with RESTEasy and it is quite simple.. details
      • Another really great part of RESTEasy is the good support for multipart form data.. details
  • Compatibility: 1
    1. general: 1
      • Using a JAX-RS compliant interface gives you a little bit better portability if you decide to switch to a different implementation down the road.. details
  • Portability: 1
    1. general: 1
      • Using a JAX-RS compliant interface gives you a little bit better portability if you decide to switch to a different implementation down the road.. details