Mined Opinions For API: neo4j-graphdb

This tab contains all the opinions collected from Stack Overflow about the API. The other tabs present summaries of the opinions using different algorithms.
  • Check out URL_http://neo4j.org/ [neo4J] The internal representation of the graph would be then delegated to the database and people have been working on this for years, so I would expect the representation to be efficient and performant.. details
  • Check out URL_http://neo4j.org/ [neo4J] The internal representation of the graph would be then delegated to the database and people have been working on this for years, so I would expect the representation to be efficient and performant.. details
Summaries the opinions about neo4j-graphdb using topic modeling.
  • 0. representation performant people graph database internal delegate year expect: 1
    • Check out neo4J The internal representation of the graph would be then delegated to the database and people have been working on this for years, so I would expect the representation to be efficient and performant.. details
Summaries of the opinions about neo4j-graphdb using three algorithms (Textrank, Lexrank and Luhn) adopted from extractive summarization. Each algorithm was used once for the positive opinions and once for the negative opinions.
  • Check out neo4J The internal representation of the graph would be then delegated to the database and people have been working on this for years, so I would expect the representation to be efficient and performant .
  • Check out neo4J The internal representation of the graph would be then delegated to the database and people have been working on this for years, so I would expect the representation to be efficient and performant .
  • Check out neo4J The internal representation of the graph would be then delegated to the database and people have been working on this for years, so I would expect the representation to be efficient and performant .
Summaries of the opinions about neo4j-graphdb using Opinosis, an abstractive summarizer of opinions..
Summaries of the opinions about neo4j-graphdb using contrastive viewpoints. Each entry contains a pair of positive and negative sentences that are most likely discussing about similar API features.
Summaries of opinions about based on specific API aspects, such as, performance, usability, etc. The 'Overview' page provides an overview of the aspects detected in the opinions. The 'Trend' page shows the distribution of polarity over time for each aspect. The 'Positive Opinions' page groups positive opinions by the detected aspects. The 'Contrastive By Aspect' page shows paris of contrastive opinions under each aspect (where found).
Performance:
  • Check out URL_http://neo4j.org/ [neo4J] The internal representation of the graph would be then delegated to the database and people have been working on this for years, so I would expect the representation to be efficient and performant.
  • N/A
Usability:
  • Check out URL_http://neo4j.org/ [neo4J] The internal representation of the graph would be then delegated to the database and people have been working on this for years, so I would expect the representation to be efficient and performant.
  • N/A
  • Performance: 1
    1. general: 1
      • Check out URL_http://neo4j.org/ [neo4J] The internal representation of the graph would be then delegated to the database and people have been working on this for years, so I would expect the representation to be efficient and performant.. details
  • Usability: 1
    1. general: 1
      • Check out URL_http://neo4j.org/ [neo4J] The internal representation of the graph would be then delegated to the database and people have been working on this for years, so I would expect the representation to be efficient and performant.. details