Mined Opinions For API: mockito

This tab contains all the opinions collected from Stack Overflow about the API. The other tabs present summaries of the opinions using different algorithms.
  • Please accept the answer if it helped you.. details
  • Please accept the answer if it helped you.. details
  • Hi Shoaib, Thanks for the clarification!!. details
  • I hope I can get something better, I don't like these argument captors and generally too much code is needed to simply describe this case and there will be many types of the requests.. details
  • Enough of talking, let's see the code itself: CODESNIPPET_JAVA1 .. details
  • I hope I can get something better, I don't like these argument captors and generally too much code is needed to simply describe this case and there will be many types of the requests.. details
  • Are there any cleaner approach instead of this testcase.. details
  • The CODETERM1 helper class for the test looks like: CODESNIPPET_JAVA4 .. details
  • My helper methods for the test case looks like: CODESNIPPET_JAVA3 .. details
  • My test code looks like : CODESNIPPET_JAVA2 .. details
  • I was thinking of maybe this method should be broken apart to two methods, but I can't see any clean and good solution because this method will be used as an access point from other components in the system, therefore one method should accomplish one thing.. details
  • Thanks .. details
  • Thanks .. details
  • External dependencies (e.g., JUnit, Mockito, Easy Mock, JayWay, etc.). details
  • URL_http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19626609/mocking-httpclient-execute-issues - mockito.. details
  • Please add some more code so we can understand exact mocking objects.. details
  • Please add some more code so we can understand exact mocking objects.. details
  • URL_http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19626609/mocking-httpclient-execute-issues - mockito.. details
  • So basically I would like to build up my unit test for this something like: Mock the CODETERM2 (somehow) to correctly generate JSON results based on the requests.Correct me if I'm wrong but I could marshal back the JSON result if I build up the mocked object hierarchy.My problem here is that I need to create the hierarchy for every single request, but I guess I cannot do anything fancier here.I should assert that the CODETERM3 method invoked with the expected device ID.. details
  • Remember test cases are just for developers help.We can mock anything and return anything or any stub object.Just we write test case to check our control flow by passing expected and non expected values.. details
  • This will make your work easy.Now you want to mock your BufferReader class use this.. details
  • I have a stubbed JSON OBJECT but need to mock the following using Mockito: CODESNIPPET_JAVA1 .. details
  • I have a stubbed JSON OBJECT but need to mock the following using Mockito: CODESNIPPET_JAVA1 .. details
Summaries the opinions about mockito using topic modeling.
  • 0. case helper describe captor request generally argument simply clientrequest requestcreator: 6
    • My helper methods for the test case looks like: CODESNIPPET .. details
    • The RequestDescriptor, RequestCreator, ClientRequest, ClientResponse helper class for the test looks like: CODESNIPPET .. details
    • Are there any cleaner approach instead of this testcase.. details
    • I hope I can get something better, I don't like these argument captors and generally too much code is needed to simply describe this case and there will be many types of the requests.. details
    • My test code looks like : CODESNIPPET .. details
    • Thanks .. details
  • 1. solution system point thing junit external jayway clarification shoaib answer: 5
    • Hi Shoaib, Thanks for the clarification!!. details
    • Please accept the answer if it helped you.. details
    • I was thinking of maybe this method should be broken apart to two methods, but I can't see any clean and good solution because this method will be used as an access point from other components in the system, therefore one method should accomplish one thing.. details
    • Enough of talking, let's see the code itself: CODESNIPPET .. details
    • External dependencies (e.g., JUnit, Mockito, Easy Mock, JayWay, etc.). details
  • 0. expect result case hierarchy build return flow bufferreader stub marshal: 6
    • - mockito.. details
    • Please add some more code so we can understand exact mocking objects.. details
    • So basically I would like to build up my unit test for this something like: Mock the Retrofit (somehow) to correctly generate JSON results based on the requests.Correct me if I'm wrong but I could marshal back the JSON result if I build up the mocked object hierarchy.My problem here is that I need to create the hierarchy for every single request, but I guess I cannot do anything fancier here.I should assert that the changeDeviceName method invoked with the expected device ID.. details
    • This will make your work easy.Now you want to mock your BufferReader class use this.. details
    • Remember test cases are just for developers help.We can mock anything and return anything or any stub object.Just we write test case to check our control flow by passing expected and non expected values.. details
    • I have a stubbed JSON OBJECT but need to mock the following using Mockito: CODESNIPPET .. details
Summaries of the opinions about mockito using three algorithms (Textrank, Lexrank and Luhn) adopted from extractive summarization. Each algorithm was used once for the positive opinions and once for the negative opinions.
  • I was thinking of maybe this method should be broken apart to two methods, but I can't see any clean and good solution because this method will be used as an access point from other components in the system, therefore one method should accomplish one thing .
  • My test code looks like : CODESNIPPET JAVA2 .
  • My helper methods for the test case looks like: CODESNIPPET JAVA3 .
  • Are there any cleaner approach instead of this testcase .
  • I hope I can get something better, I don't like these argument captors and generally too much code is needed to simply describe this case and there will be many types of the requests .
  • External dependencies (e g , JUnit, Mockito, Easy Mock, JayWay, etc ).
  • Thanks .
  • Please accept the answer if it helped you .
  • Hi Shoaib, Thanks for the clarification!!.
  • Please accept the answer if it helped you .
  • I was thinking of maybe this method should be broken apart to two methods, but I can't see any clean and good solution because this method will be used as an access point from other components in the system, therefore one method should accomplish one thing .
  • Enough of talking, let's see the code itself: CODESNIPPET JAVA1 .
  • My test code looks like : CODESNIPPET JAVA2 .
  • My helper methods for the test case looks like: CODESNIPPET JAVA3 .
  • The RequestDescriptor, RequestCreator, ClientRequest, ClientResponse helper class for the test looks like: CODESNIPPET JAVA4 .
  • Are there any cleaner approach instead of this testcase .
  • I hope I can get something better, I don't like these argument captors and generally too much code is needed to simply describe this case and there will be many types of the requests .
  • Please accept the answer if it helped you .
  • Hi Shoaib, Thanks for the clarification!!.
  • Please accept the answer if it helped you .
  • I was thinking of maybe this method should be broken apart to two methods, but I can't see any clean and good solution because this method will be used as an access point from other components in the system, therefore one method should accomplish one thing .
  • Enough of talking, let's see the code itself: CODESNIPPET JAVA1 .
  • My test code looks like : CODESNIPPET JAVA2 .
  • My helper methods for the test case looks like: CODESNIPPET JAVA3 .
  • The RequestDescriptor, RequestCreator, ClientRequest, ClientResponse helper class for the test looks like: CODESNIPPET JAVA4 .
  • Are there any cleaner approach instead of this testcase .
  • I hope I can get something better, I don't like these argument captors and generally too much code is needed to simply describe this case and there will be many types of the requests .
  • Please accept the answer if it helped you .
  • Hi Shoaib, Thanks for the clarification!!.
  • Please accept the answer if it helped you .
  • So basically I would like to build up my unit test for this something like: Mock the Retrofit (somehow) to correctly generate JSON results based on the requests Correct me if I'm wrong but I could marshal back the JSON result if I build up the mocked object hierarchy My problem here is that I need to create the hierarchy for every single request, but I guess I cannot do anything fancier here I should assert that the changeDeviceName method invoked with the expected device ID .
  • I have a stubbed JSON OBJECT but need to mock the following using Mockito: CODESNIPPET JAVA1 .
  • mockito .
  • Please add some more code so we can understand exact mocking objects .
  • Remember test cases are just for developers help We can mock anything and return anything or any stub object Just we write test case to check our control flow by passing expected and non expected values .
  • This will make your work easy Now you want to mock your BufferReader class use this .
  • I have a stubbed JSON OBJECT but need to mock the following using Mockito: CODESNIPPET JAVA1 .
  • mockito .
  • Please add some more code so we can understand exact mocking objects .
  • So basically I would like to build up my unit test for this something like: Mock the Retrofit (somehow) to correctly generate JSON results based on the requests Correct me if I'm wrong but I could marshal back the JSON result if I build up the mocked object hierarchy My problem here is that I need to create the hierarchy for every single request, but I guess I cannot do anything fancier here I should assert that the changeDeviceName method invoked with the expected device ID .
  • I have a stubbed JSON OBJECT but need to mock the following using Mockito: CODESNIPPET JAVA1 .
  • mockito .
  • Please add some more code so we can understand exact mocking objects .
  • Remember test cases are just for developers help We can mock anything and return anything or any stub object Just we write test case to check our control flow by passing expected and non expected values .
  • This will make your work easy Now you want to mock your BufferReader class use this .
  • I have a stubbed JSON OBJECT but need to mock the following using Mockito: CODESNIPPET JAVA1 .
  • mockito .
  • Please add some more code so we can understand exact mocking objects .
  • So basically I would like to build up my unit test for this something like: Mock the Retrofit (somehow) to correctly generate JSON results based on the requests Correct me if I'm wrong but I could marshal back the JSON result if I build up the mocked object hierarchy My problem here is that I need to create the hierarchy for every single request, but I guess I cannot do anything fancier here I should assert that the changeDeviceName method invoked with the expected device ID .
  • I have a stubbed JSON OBJECT but need to mock the following using Mockito: CODESNIPPET JAVA1 .
  • mockito .
  • Please add some more code so we can understand exact mocking objects .
  • Remember test cases are just for developers help We can mock anything and return anything or any stub object Just we write test case to check our control flow by passing expected and non expected values .
  • This will make your work easy Now you want to mock your BufferReader class use this .
  • I have a stubbed JSON OBJECT but need to mock the following using Mockito: CODESNIPPET JAVA1 .
  • mockito .
  • Please add some more code so we can understand exact mocking objects .
Summaries of the opinions about mockito using Opinosis, an abstractive summarizer of opinions..
  • please add some more code so we can understand exact mocking objects .
Summaries of the opinions about mockito using contrastive viewpoints. Each entry contains a pair of positive and negative sentences that are most likely discussing about similar API features.
Summaries of opinions about based on specific API aspects, such as, performance, usability, etc. The 'Overview' page provides an overview of the aspects detected in the opinions. The 'Trend' page shows the distribution of polarity over time for each aspect. The 'Positive Opinions' page groups positive opinions by the detected aspects. The 'Contrastive By Aspect' page shows paris of contrastive opinions under each aspect (where found).
Features:
  • Please accept the answer if it helped you.
  • N/A
Documentation:
  • N/A
  • URL_http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19626609/mocking-httpclient-execute-issues - mockito.
Onlysentiment:
  • Hi Shoaib, Thanks for the clarification!!
  • N/A
Bug:
  • I hope I can get something better, I don't like these argument captors and generally too much code is needed to simply describe this case and there will be many types of the requests.
  • N/A
Usability:
  • I hope I can get something better, I don't like these argument captors and generally too much code is needed to simply describe this case and there will be many types of the requests.
  • Please add some more code so we can understand exact mocking objects.
  • Onlysentiment: 3
    1. general: 3
  • Features: 7
    1. general: 7
      • Please accept the answer if it helped you.. details
      • Please accept the answer if it helped you.. details
      • Enough of talking, let's see the code itself: CODESNIPPET_JAVA1 .. details
      • Are there any cleaner approach instead of this testcase.. details
      • The CODETERM1 helper class for the test looks like: CODESNIPPET_JAVA4 .. details
      • My helper methods for the test case looks like: CODESNIPPET_JAVA3 .. details
      • My test code looks like : CODESNIPPET_JAVA2 .. details
  • Bug: 1
    1. general: 1
      • I hope I can get something better, I don't like these argument captors and generally too much code is needed to simply describe this case and there will be many types of the requests.. details
  • Usability: 3
    1. general: 3
      • I hope I can get something better, I don't like these argument captors and generally too much code is needed to simply describe this case and there will be many types of the requests.. details
      • I was thinking of maybe this method should be broken apart to two methods, but I can't see any clean and good solution because this method will be used as an access point from other components in the system, therefore one method should accomplish one thing.. details
      • External dependencies (e.g., JUnit, Mockito, Easy Mock, JayWay, etc.). details
  • Documentation: 2
    1. general: 2
      • URL_http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19626609/mocking-httpclient-execute-issues - mockito.. details
      • URL_http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19626609/mocking-httpclient-execute-issues - mockito.. details
  • Usability: 7
    1. general: 7
      • Please add some more code so we can understand exact mocking objects.. details
      • Please add some more code so we can understand exact mocking objects.. details
      • So basically I would like to build up my unit test for this something like: Mock the CODETERM2 (somehow) to correctly generate JSON results based on the requests.Correct me if I'm wrong but I could marshal back the JSON result if I build up the mocked object hierarchy.My problem here is that I need to create the hierarchy for every single request, but I guess I cannot do anything fancier here.I should assert that the CODETERM3 method invoked with the expected device ID.. details
      • Remember test cases are just for developers help.We can mock anything and return anything or any stub object.Just we write test case to check our control flow by passing expected and non expected values.. details
      • This will make your work easy.Now you want to mock your BufferReader class use this.. details
      • I have a stubbed JSON OBJECT but need to mock the following using Mockito: CODESNIPPET_JAVA1 .. details
      • I have a stubbed JSON OBJECT but need to mock the following using Mockito: CODESNIPPET_JAVA1 .. details