Mined Opinions For API: jinahya

This tab contains all the opinions collected from Stack Overflow about the API. The other tabs present summaries of the opinions using different algorithms.
  • Your implementation is decent enough.. details
  • I've fixed the factory method for others to see, I hope you don't mind.. details
  • I've fixed the factory method for others to see, I hope you don't mind.. details
  • You can see full mavenized project at URL_http://code.google.com/p/jinahya/sou rce/browse/trunk/com.googlecode.jinahya/stackoverflow/ [ URL_http://code.google.com /p/jinahya/source/browse/trunk/com.googlecode.jinahya/stackoverflow/] JAXB doesn't need the setter if you control to use fields not properties.. details
  • You can see full mavenized project at URL_http://code.google.com/p/jinahya/sou rce/browse/trunk/com.googlecode.jinahya/stackoverflow/ [ URL_http://code.google.com /p/jinahya/source/browse/trunk/com.googlecode.jinahya/stackoverflow/] JAXB doesn't need the setter if you control to use fields not properties.. details
Summaries the opinions about jinahya using topic modeling.
  • 0. mind factory implementation: 2
    • I've fixed the factory method for others to see, I hope you don't mind.. details
    • Your implementation is decent enough.. details
  • 0. browse stackoverflow trunk control full jaxb mavenized rce property setter: 1
    • You can see full mavenized project at rce/browse/trunk/com.googlecode.jinahya/stackoverflow/ [ /p/jinahya/source/browse/trunk/com.googlecode.jinahya/stackoverflow/ JAXB doesn't need the setter if you control to use fields not properties.. details
Summaries of the opinions about jinahya using three algorithms (Textrank, Lexrank and Luhn) adopted from extractive summarization. Each algorithm was used once for the positive opinions and once for the negative opinions.
  • I've fixed the factory method for others to see, I hope you don't mind .
  • Your implementation is decent enough .
  • I've fixed the factory method for others to see, I hope you don't mind .
  • Your implementation is decent enough .
  • I've fixed the factory method for others to see, I hope you don't mind .
  • Your implementation is decent enough .
  • You can see full mavenized project at rce browse trunk com googlecode jinahya stackoverflow p jinahya source browse trunk com googlecode jinahya stackoverflow JAXB doesn't need the setter if you control to use fields not properties .
  • You can see full mavenized project at rce browse trunk com googlecode jinahya stackoverflow p jinahya source browse trunk com googlecode jinahya stackoverflow JAXB doesn't need the setter if you control to use fields not properties .
  • You can see full mavenized project at rce browse trunk com googlecode jinahya stackoverflow p jinahya source browse trunk com googlecode jinahya stackoverflow JAXB doesn't need the setter if you control to use fields not properties .
Summaries of the opinions about jinahya using Opinosis, an abstractive summarizer of opinions..
Summaries of the opinions about jinahya using contrastive viewpoints. Each entry contains a pair of positive and negative sentences that are most likely discussing about similar API features.
Summaries of opinions about based on specific API aspects, such as, performance, usability, etc. The 'Overview' page provides an overview of the aspects detected in the opinions. The 'Trend' page shows the distribution of polarity over time for each aspect. The 'Positive Opinions' page groups positive opinions by the detected aspects. The 'Contrastive By Aspect' page shows paris of contrastive opinions under each aspect (where found).
Documentation:
  • N/A
  • You can see full mavenized project at URL_http://code.google.com/p/jinahya/sou rce/browse/trunk/com.googlecode.jinahya/stackoverflow/ [ URL_http://code.google.com /p/jinahya/source/browse/trunk/com.googlecode.jinahya/stackoverflow/] JAXB doesn't need the setter if you control to use fields not properties.
Features:
  • Your implementation is decent enough.
  • N/A
Usability:
  • I've fixed the factory method for others to see, I hope you don't mind.
  • You can see full mavenized project at URL_http://code.google.com/p/jinahya/sou rce/browse/trunk/com.googlecode.jinahya/stackoverflow/ [ URL_http://code.google.com /p/jinahya/source/browse/trunk/com.googlecode.jinahya/stackoverflow/] JAXB doesn't need the setter if you control to use fields not properties.
Bug:
  • I've fixed the factory method for others to see, I hope you don't mind.
  • N/A
  • Features: 1
    1. general: 1
      • Your implementation is decent enough.. details
  • Bug: 1
    1. general: 1
      • I've fixed the factory method for others to see, I hope you don't mind.. details
  • Usability: 1
    1. general: 1
      • I've fixed the factory method for others to see, I hope you don't mind.. details
  • Documentation: 1
    1. general: 1
      • You can see full mavenized project at URL_http://code.google.com/p/jinahya/sou rce/browse/trunk/com.googlecode.jinahya/stackoverflow/ [ URL_http://code.google.com /p/jinahya/source/browse/trunk/com.googlecode.jinahya/stackoverflow/] JAXB doesn't need the setter if you control to use fields not properties.. details
  • Usability: 1
    1. general: 1
      • You can see full mavenized project at URL_http://code.google.com/p/jinahya/sou rce/browse/trunk/com.googlecode.jinahya/stackoverflow/ [ URL_http://code.google.com /p/jinahya/source/browse/trunk/com.googlecode.jinahya/stackoverflow/] JAXB doesn't need the setter if you control to use fields not properties.. details