Mined Opinions For API: jersey

This tab contains all the opinions collected from Stack Overflow about the API. The other tabs present summaries of the opinions using different algorithms.
  • YES!. details
  • YES!. details
  • If one existed I'd prefer a HTTP framework that worked with Gson instead of Jersey as I'm more comfortable with it.. details
  • I need to build the server side of a JSON-REST API, and I've been playing with Jersey to do it (using it's JSON-POJO mapping feature).. details
  • The problem is that even testing the simplest possible use-case has required several questions here on SO, and quite a bit of hunting around.. details
  • Yes, I'm very familiar with Gson, and Jersey already uses Jackson, but converting JSON to and from POJOs is only one part of the problem, I'm looking for an alternative to Jersey, which is a framework for building REST-HTTP APIs.. details
Summaries the opinions about jersey using topic modeling.
  • 0. build side question hunt require simple case exist mapping play: 5
    • If one existed I'd prefer a HTTP framework that worked with Gson instead of Jersey as I'm more comfortable with it.. details
    • YES!. details
    • YES!. details
    • I need to build the server side of a JSON-REST API, and I've been playing with Jersey to do it (using it's JSON-POJO mapping feature).. details
    • The problem is that even testing the simplest possible use-case has required several questions here on SO, and quite a bit of hunting around.. details
  • 0. building jackson pojos familiar rest http gson: 1
    • Yes, I'm very familiar with Gson, and Jersey already uses Jackson, but converting JSON to and from POJOs is only one part of the problem, I'm looking for an alternative to Jersey, which is a framework for building REST-HTTP APIs.. details
Summaries of the opinions about jersey using three algorithms (Textrank, Lexrank and Luhn) adopted from extractive summarization. Each algorithm was used once for the positive opinions and once for the negative opinions.
  • If one existed I'd prefer a HTTP framework that worked with Gson instead of Jersey as I'm more comfortable with it .
  • I need to build the server side of a JSON REST API, and I've been playing with Jersey to do it (using it's JSON POJO mapping feature) .
  • The problem is that even testing the simplest possible use case has required several questions here on SO, and quite a bit of hunting around .
  • If one existed I'd prefer a HTTP framework that worked with Gson instead of Jersey as I'm more comfortable with it .
  • I need to build the server side of a JSON REST API, and I've been playing with Jersey to do it (using it's JSON POJO mapping feature) .
  • The problem is that even testing the simplest possible use case has required several questions here on SO, and quite a bit of hunting around .
  • If one existed I'd prefer a HTTP framework that worked with Gson instead of Jersey as I'm more comfortable with it .
  • I need to build the server side of a JSON REST API, and I've been playing with Jersey to do it (using it's JSON POJO mapping feature) .
  • The problem is that even testing the simplest possible use case has required several questions here on SO, and quite a bit of hunting around .
  • Yes, I'm very familiar with Gson, and Jersey already uses Jackson, but converting JSON to and from POJOs is only one part of the problem, I'm looking for an alternative to Jersey, which is a framework for building REST HTTP APIs .
  • Yes, I'm very familiar with Gson, and Jersey already uses Jackson, but converting JSON to and from POJOs is only one part of the problem, I'm looking for an alternative to Jersey, which is a framework for building REST HTTP APIs .
  • Yes, I'm very familiar with Gson, and Jersey already uses Jackson, but converting JSON to and from POJOs is only one part of the problem, I'm looking for an alternative to Jersey, which is a framework for building REST HTTP APIs .
Summaries of the opinions about jersey using Opinosis, an abstractive summarizer of opinions..
Summaries of the opinions about jersey using contrastive viewpoints. Each entry contains a pair of positive and negative sentences that are most likely discussing about similar API features.
Summaries of opinions about based on specific API aspects, such as, performance, usability, etc. The 'Overview' page provides an overview of the aspects detected in the opinions. The 'Trend' page shows the distribution of polarity over time for each aspect. The 'Positive Opinions' page groups positive opinions by the detected aspects. The 'Contrastive By Aspect' page shows paris of contrastive opinions under each aspect (where found).
Features:
  • YES!
  • N/A
Usability:
  • If one existed I'd prefer a HTTP framework that worked with Gson instead of Jersey as I'm more comfortable with it.
  • Yes, I'm very familiar with Gson, and Jersey already uses Jackson, but converting JSON to and from POJOs is only one part of the problem, I'm looking for an alternative to Jersey, which is a framework for building REST-HTTP APIs.
  • Features: 2
    1. general: 2
  • Usability: 3
    1. general: 3
      • If one existed I'd prefer a HTTP framework that worked with Gson instead of Jersey as I'm more comfortable with it.. details
      • I need to build the server side of a JSON-REST API, and I've been playing with Jersey to do it (using it's JSON-POJO mapping feature).. details
      • The problem is that even testing the simplest possible use-case has required several questions here on SO, and quite a bit of hunting around.. details
  • Usability: 1
    1. general: 1
      • Yes, I'm very familiar with Gson, and Jersey already uses Jackson, but converting JSON to and from POJOs is only one part of the problem, I'm looking for an alternative to Jersey, which is a framework for building REST-HTTP APIs.. details