Mined Opinions For API: dozer

This tab contains all the opinions collected from Stack Overflow about the API. The other tabs present summaries of the opinions using different algorithms.
  • (If there's a lot to map, you could use a Framework like Dozer to do it for you).. details
  • The OP also wants a succinct configuration-based transformation facility, and for that you might try Dozer (which also operates on plain Java objects.. details
  • I was rather hoping to avoid having to merge beans, past experience of this king was rather bad.. details
Summaries the opinions about dozer using topic modeling.
  • 0. lot operate based facility plain succinct configuration transformation: 2
    • (If there's a lot to map, you could use a Framework like Dozer to do it for you).. details
    • The OP also wants a succinct configuration-based transformation facility, and for that you might try Dozer (which also operates on plain Java objects.. details
  • 0. merge avoid bean experience king: 1
    • I was rather hoping to avoid having to merge beans, past experience of this king was rather bad.. details
Summaries of the opinions about dozer using three algorithms (Textrank, Lexrank and Luhn) adopted from extractive summarization. Each algorithm was used once for the positive opinions and once for the negative opinions.
  • (If there's a lot to map, you could use a Framework like Dozer to do it for you) .
  • The OP also wants a succinct configuration based transformation facility, and for that you might try Dozer (which also operates on plain Java objects .
  • (If there's a lot to map, you could use a Framework like Dozer to do it for you) .
  • The OP also wants a succinct configuration based transformation facility, and for that you might try Dozer (which also operates on plain Java objects .
  • (If there's a lot to map, you could use a Framework like Dozer to do it for you) .
  • The OP also wants a succinct configuration based transformation facility, and for that you might try Dozer (which also operates on plain Java objects .
  • I was rather hoping to avoid having to merge beans, past experience of this king was rather bad .
  • I was rather hoping to avoid having to merge beans, past experience of this king was rather bad .
  • I was rather hoping to avoid having to merge beans, past experience of this king was rather bad .
Summaries of the opinions about dozer using Opinosis, an abstractive summarizer of opinions..
Summaries of the opinions about dozer using contrastive viewpoints. Each entry contains a pair of positive and negative sentences that are most likely discussing about similar API features.
Summaries of opinions about based on specific API aspects, such as, performance, usability, etc. The 'Overview' page provides an overview of the aspects detected in the opinions. The 'Trend' page shows the distribution of polarity over time for each aspect. The 'Positive Opinions' page groups positive opinions by the detected aspects. The 'Contrastive By Aspect' page shows paris of contrastive opinions under each aspect (where found).
Usability:
  • (If there's a lot to map, you could use a Framework like Dozer to do it for you).
  • I was rather hoping to avoid having to merge beans, past experience of this king was rather bad.
  • Usability: 2
    1. general: 2
      • (If there's a lot to map, you could use a Framework like Dozer to do it for you).. details
      • The OP also wants a succinct configuration-based transformation facility, and for that you might try Dozer (which also operates on plain Java objects.. details
  • Usability: 1
    1. general: 1
      • I was rather hoping to avoid having to merge beans, past experience of this king was rather bad.. details