Mined Opinions For API: com.dyuproject.protostuff

This tab contains all the opinions collected from Stack Overflow about the API. The other tabs present summaries of the opinions using different algorithms.
  • it says: A serialization library with built-in support for forward-backward compatibility (schema evolution) and validation.available formats: protostuff (native), protobuff, json .... details
  • protostuff could probably fit with your requirements, see URL_http://code.google.com/p/protostuff/ [ URL_http://code.google.com/p/protostuff/ ] it takes a special language describing the base data structure an produces tidy java classes with annotations.. details
  • @Eric support for generics and circular references is not part of the google spec; protobuf-net and protostuff essentially cheat with extensions (that fit the wire spec); I have no idea if the approaches taken for the two are even remotely similar.. details
Summaries the opinions about com.dyuproject.protostuff using topic modeling.
  • 0. requirement compatibility base structure produce describe fit schema native protobuff: 2
    • it says: A serialization library with built-in support for forward-backward compatibility (schema evolution) and validation.available formats: protostuff (native), protobuff, json .... details
    • protostuff could probably fit with your requirements, see it takes a special language describing the base data structure an produces tidy java classes with annotations.. details
  • 0. spec essentially wire protobuf fit idea remotely extension approach eric: 1
    • @Eric support for generics and circular references is not part of the google spec; protobuf-net and protostuff essentially cheat with extensions (that fit the wire spec); I have no idea if the approaches taken for the two are even remotely similar.. details
Summaries of the opinions about com.dyuproject.protostuff using three algorithms (Textrank, Lexrank and Luhn) adopted from extractive summarization. Each algorithm was used once for the positive opinions and once for the negative opinions.
  • protostuff could probably fit with your requirements, see it takes a special language describing the base data structure an produces tidy java classes with annotations .
  • it says: A serialization library with built in support for forward backward compatibility (schema evolution) and validation available formats: protostuff (native), protobuff, json .
  • protostuff could probably fit with your requirements, see it takes a special language describing the base data structure an produces tidy java classes with annotations .
  • it says: A serialization library with built in support for forward backward compatibility (schema evolution) and validation available formats: protostuff (native), protobuff, json .
  • protostuff could probably fit with your requirements, see it takes a special language describing the base data structure an produces tidy java classes with annotations .
  • it says: A serialization library with built in support for forward backward compatibility (schema evolution) and validation available formats: protostuff (native), protobuff, json .
  • @Eric support for generics and circular references is not part of the google spec; protobuf net and protostuff essentially cheat with extensions (that fit the wire spec); I have no idea if the approaches taken for the two are even remotely similar .
  • @Eric support for generics and circular references is not part of the google spec; protobuf net and protostuff essentially cheat with extensions (that fit the wire spec); I have no idea if the approaches taken for the two are even remotely similar .
  • @Eric support for generics and circular references is not part of the google spec; protobuf net and protostuff essentially cheat with extensions (that fit the wire spec); I have no idea if the approaches taken for the two are even remotely similar .
Summaries of the opinions about com.dyuproject.protostuff using Opinosis, an abstractive summarizer of opinions..
Summaries of the opinions about com.dyuproject.protostuff using contrastive viewpoints. Each entry contains a pair of positive and negative sentences that are most likely discussing about similar API features.
Summaries of opinions about based on specific API aspects, such as, performance, usability, etc. The 'Overview' page provides an overview of the aspects detected in the opinions. The 'Trend' page shows the distribution of polarity over time for each aspect. The 'Positive Opinions' page groups positive opinions by the detected aspects. The 'Contrastive By Aspect' page shows paris of contrastive opinions under each aspect (where found).
Usability:
  • it says: A serialization library with built-in support for forward-backward compatibility (schema evolution) and validation.available formats: protostuff (native), protobuff, json ...
  • @Eric support for generics and circular references is not part of the google spec; protobuf-net and protostuff essentially cheat with extensions (that fit the wire spec); I have no idea if the approaches taken for the two are even remotely similar.
  • Usability: 2
    1. general: 2
      • it says: A serialization library with built-in support for forward-backward compatibility (schema evolution) and validation.available formats: protostuff (native), protobuff, json .... details
      • protostuff could probably fit with your requirements, see URL_http://code.google.com/p/protostuff/ [ URL_http://code.google.com/p/protostuff/ ] it takes a special language describing the base data structure an produces tidy java classes with annotations.. details
  • Usability: 1
    1. general: 1
      • @Eric support for generics and circular references is not part of the google spec; protobuf-net and protostuff essentially cheat with extensions (that fit the wire spec); I have no idea if the approaches taken for the two are even remotely similar.. details