Mined Opinions For API: castor

This tab contains all the opinions collected from Stack Overflow about the API. The other tabs present summaries of the opinions using different algorithms.
  • This is true, but POJO -> XML -> JSON would work with an additional library.. details
  • Thanks again... details
  • Or (perhaps the more fundamental question is) how do I support different versions of JSON bindings on the same set of Java classes?. details
  • The configuration is usually pretty limited.. details
  • If my Java domain classes changes in any way, my json responses will change as well, causing any service clients, expecting the old version of json responses, to break.. details
  • These frameworks include Castor, JiBX and the like.. details
  • Most do not extend the flexibility of mapping complex Java hierarchies into any arbitrary chosen JSON object representation.. details
Summaries the opinions about castor using topic modeling.
  • 0. change response binding expect jibx configuration fundamental true pojo service: 6
    • This is true, but POJO -> XML -> JSON would work with an additional library.. details
    • Thanks again... details
    • If my Java domain classes changes in any way, my json responses will change as well, causing any service clients, expecting the old version of json responses, to break.. details
    • Or (perhaps the more fundamental question is) how do I support different versions of JSON bindings on the same set of Java classes?. details
    • The configuration is usually pretty limited.. details
    • These frameworks include Castor, JiBX and the like.. details
  • 0. hierarchy representation choose extend: 1
    • Most do not extend the flexibility of mapping complex Java hierarchies into any arbitrary chosen JSON object representation.. details
Summaries of the opinions about castor using three algorithms (Textrank, Lexrank and Luhn) adopted from extractive summarization. Each algorithm was used once for the positive opinions and once for the negative opinions.
  • This is true, but POJO > XML > JSON would work with an additional library .
  • These frameworks include Castor, JiBX and the like .
  • The configuration is usually pretty limited .
  • If my Java domain classes changes in any way, my json responses will change as well, causing any service clients, expecting the old version of json responses, to break .
  • Or (perhaps the more fundamental question is) how do I support different versions of JSON bindings on the same set of Java classes?.
  • Thanks again .
  • This is true, but POJO > XML > JSON would work with an additional library .
  • These frameworks include Castor, JiBX and the like .
  • The configuration is usually pretty limited .
  • If my Java domain classes changes in any way, my json responses will change as well, causing any service clients, expecting the old version of json responses, to break .
  • Or (perhaps the more fundamental question is) how do I support different versions of JSON bindings on the same set of Java classes?.
  • Thanks again .
  • This is true, but POJO > XML > JSON would work with an additional library .
  • These frameworks include Castor, JiBX and the like .
  • The configuration is usually pretty limited .
  • If my Java domain classes changes in any way, my json responses will change as well, causing any service clients, expecting the old version of json responses, to break .
  • Or (perhaps the more fundamental question is) how do I support different versions of JSON bindings on the same set of Java classes?.
  • Thanks again .
  • Most do not extend the flexibility of mapping complex Java hierarchies into any arbitrary chosen JSON object representation .
  • Most do not extend the flexibility of mapping complex Java hierarchies into any arbitrary chosen JSON object representation .
  • Most do not extend the flexibility of mapping complex Java hierarchies into any arbitrary chosen JSON object representation .
Summaries of the opinions about castor using Opinosis, an abstractive summarizer of opinions..
Summaries of the opinions about castor using contrastive viewpoints. Each entry contains a pair of positive and negative sentences that are most likely discussing about similar API features.
Summaries of opinions about based on specific API aspects, such as, performance, usability, etc. The 'Overview' page provides an overview of the aspects detected in the opinions. The 'Trend' page shows the distribution of polarity over time for each aspect. The 'Positive Opinions' page groups positive opinions by the detected aspects. The 'Contrastive By Aspect' page shows paris of contrastive opinions under each aspect (where found).
Onlysentiment:
  • Thanks again..
  • N/A
Features:
  • Or (perhaps the more fundamental question is) how do I support different versions of JSON bindings on the same set of Java classes?
  • N/A
Usability:
  • This is true, but POJO -> XML -> JSON would work with an additional library.
  • Most do not extend the flexibility of mapping complex Java hierarchies into any arbitrary chosen JSON object representation.
  • Onlysentiment: 1
    1. general: 1
  • Features: 1
    1. general: 1
      • Or (perhaps the more fundamental question is) how do I support different versions of JSON bindings on the same set of Java classes?. details
  • Usability: 4
    1. general: 4
      • This is true, but POJO -> XML -> JSON would work with an additional library.. details
      • The configuration is usually pretty limited.. details
      • If my Java domain classes changes in any way, my json responses will change as well, causing any service clients, expecting the old version of json responses, to break.. details
      • These frameworks include Castor, JiBX and the like.. details
  • Usability: 1
    1. general: 1
      • Most do not extend the flexibility of mapping complex Java hierarchies into any arbitrary chosen JSON object representation.. details